Knowledge base · Science and evidence · Safety

Osteopathy and children: what does the evidence say?

The effectiveness of osteopathic treatment in children and infants, the conflicting findings on preterm infants, and safety issues.

On this page

Short answer

According to systematic reviews, the effectiveness of osteopathic treatment in children has not been proven. The results for preterm infants are contradictory. In children, too, a doctor’s diagnosis is a prerequisite.

Many claims about osteopathy for children circulate on the internet. The scientific evidence, however, presents a more cautious picture.

The overall picture

According to a systematic review of osteopathic treatment in children, its effectiveness has not been proven. A review of manipulative treatment for infantile colic noted a reduction in crying, but in the studies in which the parents did not know which group they were in, this difference was not statistically significant.

Preterm infants

One meta-analysis reported that the length of hospital stay of infants receiving osteopathic treatment was shortened by an average of 2.7 days. In a subsequently updated review, however, no effect was detected or it was very small, and the quality of the evidence was rated as very low.

Safety

Serious events, including deaths, have been described in children after treatment by various manual therapy practitioners. Most of these cases were associated with previously undiagnosed diseases. This shows that in children, too, a doctor’s diagnosis is a prerequisite.

Advertising ethics

The UK’s advertising standards body does not accept osteopaths’ claims about treating conditions such as colic, crying, feeding problems and ear infections in infants.

Conclusion

Working with children requires separate specialisation, paediatric knowledge and close collaboration with a doctor. Claims about the osteopathic treatment of developmental, speech, behavioural or chronic disorders in children have not been confirmed by scientific evidence.

Sources

  1. Posadzki P. et al. (2013). Osteopathic treatment in children: a systematic review. Pediatrics. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-3959 (opens in a new window)
  2. Dobson D. et al. (2012). Manipulative therapies for infantile colic. Cochrane review. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004796.pub2 (opens in a new window)
  3. Lanaro D. et al. (2017). Osteopathic treatment in preterm infants: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006408 (opens in a new window)
  4. Posadzki P. et al. (2022). Osteopathic treatment in preterm infants: an updated review. J Clin Med. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154455 (opens in a new window)
  5. Todd A. J. et al. (2015). Serious adverse events after manual therapy in children: a systematic review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.09.008 (opens in a new window)
  6. UK Advertising Standards Authority: guidance on advertising osteopathy (2022). asa.org.uk (opens in a new window)

This article is for educational purposes and does not replace a physician's advice.

Other articles

Search the site

Type a keyword. Results appear as you type. Press Enter for the full list.

Business card

Osteopatiya Akademiyası

Osteopathie Schule Deutschland programme · Baku

ELF Center, Rəşid Behbudov küçəsi 112, Baku

Menu

Accessibility menu

Large panel
Button and keyboard shortcuts
  • Ctrl+U — opens and closes the accessibility menu
  • / — opens the site search
  • Esc — closes the open window
  • Tab / Shift+Tab — move between elements
  • Enter / Space — activates the selected element
  • ← → — move between tabs and gallery images

When the floating button is hidden, the menu can be opened with the accessibility icon in the top bar and at the bottom of the site, and also with Ctrl+U.

Your settings are stored only in this browser and are also applied on the other pages.

Page structure

Sections

Headings